Letter: Shame on you, Rowley!

It is interesting to listen to Rowley's convoluted explanations about why he is "supporting" Manning's puerile defamation of Kamla.

"Now she knows how it feels" he said, comparing this to his experience with Ganga Singh and his own Landate issue.

I have no recollection of Ganga Singh, or anyone else, abusing Rowley in that matter. 

But when Manning tore into Rowley, it was because Rowley was "a raging bull", a "wajang", a plea to understand how poor Patos could have tolerated this Rowley menace, and "where the money gone". And then Manning's compliant "Integrity" Commission ruled on Rowley without hearing him!

And now that Manning spews his venom on Mrs. Persad Bissessar, Rowley finds himself aggrieved at the Landate affair, and supports the man who sought to humiliate him.

But this is not about fairness or integrity, is it Keith. It is about "politics having a morality of it's own".

Shame on you, Keith Rowley.

Peter O'Connor - via Email